🔗 Share this article

The year 2025 could appear more futuristic. Maybe it's the sound of the letter "f" in "five". However 2026 represents one step beyond, and it's where we currently stand, with each futuristic advancement – primarily the broad integration of AI – seeming bleak, or possibly more grim. (It often seems like in a proper dystopia, the mind-dulling corporate-sponsored dehumanizing technology would actually function more effectively?) Didn't anyone sound the alarm about this?

The response, at least concerning science fiction films made long ago (or sometimes recently) positioned in 2026, is both yes and no. A number of those warnings are broadly applicable (global catastrophe) but specifically far-fetched (when mankind is ultimately ravaged, we will almost certainly take the primate species alongside us). Others of them are visionary; the rest just look like bad green screen. Yet it remains worth examining where different directors, from geniuses to journeymen, thought we'd be positioned by now in the world's development. So let's take a look at some of the movies that have been depicted in 2026 throughout cinematic history and determine if they have anything to impart.

The Game 'Doom'

Well, this doesn't bode well. According to the video game adaptation *Doom*, whose 20th anniversary was noted by hardly anyone, 2026 is the year that humanity finds a portal to an long-lost metropolis on Mars, where the inhabitants of Earth can set up a scientific outpost. Currently, the bad stuff – regarding plot and in terms of garish cinematic imitations of a FPS video game – doesn't really go down for two more decades in the future, so should we find a Martian gateway now, we could gain a respite to avoid catastrophe. If we did uncover a portal to an old Martian city, it's truly hard to determine whether Elon Musk would still be super-psyched to send everyone to Mars or would instantly become dejected that the discovery was not a thing he funded himself, allowing him to assert savior-like ownership for humanity's journey to the cosmos. That's before we consider the harvesting of Martian chromosomes and resulting transformations into horrific creatures. (Once more, this is nearer 2046, not to be confused with the acclaimed director's film.) Overall, *Doom* is (at the very least) a useful example for why, exactly we allow Mars serve as a long-term hope for mankind. Be it in John Carpenter's cheap-looking space-western *Ghosts of Mars*, the more grounded science fiction of *Red Planet*, or the new-age mysticism of *Mission to Mars*, our distant neighbor planet doesn't tend to serve as a beacon of optimism. Should someone wants to close that dubious red-planet real estate sale, perhaps they ought to begin with first ensuring the fictional depiction look good.

Marvel's Lesser Offerings

A of the goofiest quirks of the present Marvel Cinematic Universe is how to account for the multiple world-threatening cataclysms, encompassing a five-year time-jump whose events are mostly undepicted in the movies themselves; the films have become like a alarm clock perpetually set a few minutes fast – except with minutes, it's years. So there's a whole bunch of Marvel stuff that fan sites helpfully explain to be set in 2026. The good ones, like *Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3* and the underappreciated adventure *The Marvels*, occur far away from Earth, and so feel quite unmoored from any concrete sense of time. However the poorer material is among the weakest Marvel has ever produced: the convoluted and aimless TV show *Secret Invasion* and the remote-meeting farce of *Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania*. Judging by these examples, we're facing a whole lot of frustrating stagnation in 2026, along with the related narrative that in truth, this confusing mess unfolding in front of us is essential to future events. More troublingly, in the actual world that assertion will probably turn out to be accurate.

The Apes Saga Continues

Most of the original five-movie *Planet of the Apes* cycle is located in the more distant tomorrow of Earth, but the new trilogy that began with 2011’s *Rise of the Planet of the Apes* starts closer to home, starting its chronology approximately 2016. Thus, when a virus that devastates the majority of Earth’s people has done its damage, and simultaneously boosted the cognitive abilities of primates, it’s merely 2026, with further human indignities (and victories for apes) ahead. The post-credits scene of *Rise*, illustrating how rapidly this virus propagates around the world and set in 2019, appears profoundly unsettling in the wake of the real-world global health crisis that would begin in 2020. By comparison, the movie *Dawn* looks more abstract; astonishingly, we’re now six years out from the onset of Covid-19, and humanity, though obviously wounded by the ongoing virus, was not annihilated, and our technology certainly hasn't been disabled. Yet this most pessimistic of the quartet of contemporary *Apes* movies (at least so far!) nonetheless contains a substantial bummer to offer, suggesting that the fundamental nature of beings, however one defines either, will inevitably lead to violent conflict, regardless of the efforts of the most well-meaning among us. We’re subject to the whims of those who appeal to others’ worst instincts, even if those drives are not held by the most. Currently, it seems difficult to dispute that, despite the fact that we probably should.

Metropolis

By far the most prominent depiction of 2026 in film is from a movie nearing celebrating its centennial. The director's iconic silent film *Metropolis* takes place in a city of tomorrow where wealthy industrialists lord over the towers as workers work tirelessly underground on the machines that power the city. Rich city-dweller Freder, scion of the city’s ruler, has his eyes opened to these massive social gaps when he becomes obsessed with Maria, an subterranean organizer who preaches a coming together of the separate strata of Metropolis. A scientist with darker plans builds a robot in her image, aiming to tear the entire Metropolis to ruin. In this narrative, a robot created to mimic a human isn't a tool of the ruling corporate class, but someone who wants to witness their downfall; it's one element inverted by reality in a vision of tomorrow that in other ways seems to be progressing. *Metropolis* also imagines a world where advanced machinery relies on traditional human toil, which appears as a perfect union of conservative disdain for “the working class” and corporate zeal for an tech boom. It has not yet come to pass, but it's simple to imagine a somewhat less stylish-looking iteration of Lang’s city growing with the prospect of a resurgence to industrial production. The more complex, harder-to-imagine accomplishment is the conclusion of the film, where the chasm between the haves and the poor is spanned with love; not so much with concrete reforms. Like *Dawn of the Planet of the Apes*, the movie pleads for coexistence; in contrast to *Dawn*, it seems hopeful about the chance