🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to set aside a lower court's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision comes amid a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of additional conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A top House figure said the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.