🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios introduced a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough format but includes a few key adjustments:

• Each team includes only 8 human participants, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions done by real players grant full XP, while bot actions provide lower rewards.
• Only two locations can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist delivers on its title: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it provides additional choices for gamers looking for alternative methods to enjoy the title. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," says a different user. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," and another details all the issues they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says one Reddit comment. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and don't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds another. A response via social media clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Input

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it will make wait times even longer for different playlists due to the sheer number of playlists currently available. On a similar note, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the community meeting them halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "making a mistake so hard, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, should analytics indicates this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.